• D Ghia, P Thomas, D Cordato, D Epstein, R G Beran, C Cappelen-Smith, N Griffith, I Hanna, A McDougall, S J Hodgkinson, and J M Worthington.
• Neurology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
• Intern Med J. 2012 Aug 1; 42 (8): 913-8.

BackgroundThe ABCD(2) stroke risk score is recommended in national guidelines for stratifying care in transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients, based on its prediction of early stroke risk. We had become concerned about the score accuracy and its clinical value in modern TIA cohorts.MethodsWe identified emergency department-diagnosed TIA at two hospitals over 3 years (2004-2006). Cases were followed for stroke occurrence and ABCD(2) scores were determined from expert record review. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values (PPV) of moderate-high ABCD(2) scores were determined.ResultsThere were 827 indexed TIA diagnoses and record review was possible in 95.4%. Admitted patients had lower 30-day stroke risk (n = 0) than discharged patients (n = 7; 3.1%) (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in proportion of strokes between those with a low or moderate-high ABCD(2) score at 30 (1.2 vs 0.8%), 90 (2.0 vs 1.9%) and 365 days (2.4 vs 2.4%) respectively. At 30 days the sensitivity, specificity and PPV of a moderate-high score were 57% (95% confidence interval (CI) 25.0-84.2), 32.2% (95% CI 29.1-35.6) and 0.75% (95% CI 0.29-1.91) respectively.ConclusionsEarly stroke risk was low after an emergency diagnosis of TIA and significantly lower in admitted patients. Moderate-high ABCD(2) scores did not predict early stroke risk. We suggest local validation of ABCD(2) before its clinical use and a review of its place in national guidelines.© 2011 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal © 2011 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

25 keywords...

hide…