• David McD Taylor, Karen Ashby, and Ken D Winkel.
• Emergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. david.taylor@mh.org.au
• Wilderness Environ Med. 2002 Jan 1; 13 (2): 106-12.

ObjectiveTo describe the epidemiology of marine animal injury in Victoria, Australia, in order to identify risk factors and recommend prevention strategies.MethodsRetrospective, descriptive study of patients with marine animal injuries who presented to Victorian emergency departments between October 1995 and June 2000. Data were obtained from the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset. The main outcome measures were the marine animal involved; the nature, time, and place of injury; and subject demographics and activity.ResultsTwo hundred five injuries were identified, and males predominated (71.7%, P < .01). Injuries were most frequent during summer and when jellyfish were most prevalent. Various fish species, stingrays, jellyfish, and sharks were incriminated in 83 (40.5%), 46 (22.4%), 42 (20.5%), and 5 (2.4%) injuries, respectively. Most (65.9%) injuries occurred during leisure or sport, and 72 (35.1%) occurred in a place of recreation. Spikes, spines, and barbs caused 82 (40.0%) injuries, and stings caused 54 (26.3%) injuries. Bites were uncommon. Most injuries were to the limbs, with the hands or feet injured in 127 (62.0%) patients. Forty (19.5%) injuries were associated with a retained foreign body. Only 17 (8.3%) patients required admission to the hospital.ConclusionsMarine animal injury is seasonal but rarely serious. Vigilance is required when handling fish, and protective gloves, footwear, and clothing are recommended where appropriate. Clinicians should consider retained foreign bodies in penetrating injuries. Warnings are recommended when jellyfish are most prevalent.

29 keywords...

hide…