• Int. J. Cardiol. · Mar 2016

    Review Meta Analysis

    Efficacy and safety of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • Yann Poirier, Pierre Voisine, Guillaume Plourde, Goran Rimac, Alberto Barria Perez, Olivier Costerousse, and Olivier F Bertrand.
    • Quebec Heart-Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec (Quebec), Canada.
    • Int. J. Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15; 207: 67-79.

    BackgroundIntra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) can be used prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in high-risk patients. Whether this technique remains safe and effective in contemporary practice is controversial.ObjectiveWe have completed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies to evaluate the safety and benefits of IABP prior to CABG surgery.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, with cross-referencing of relevant articles for studies assessing the impact of IABP prior to and after isolated CABG. Two investigators independently sorted the potentially relevant studies, and three extracted data. The assessed outcomes included in-hospital and 30-day mortality, IABP-related complications and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay.ResultsFrom 1977 to 2015 we included 11 randomized controlled trials (n=1293) (RCTs) and 22 observational studies, including a total of 46,067 patients. Analyses from RCTs suggested that IABP prior to CABG was associated with a significant reduction in hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.44; P<0.0001) and 30-day mortality compared to no preoperative IABP (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25-0.76; P=0.003). IABP prior to CABG was also associated with shorter intensive care unit (weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.47day; 95% CI: -1.82 to -1.12day; P<0.00001) and hospital length of stay (WMD -3.25days; 95% CI: -5.18 to -1.33days; P=0.0009). However, there were significant bias and limitations among included studies. Furthermore, results for similar outcomes from observational studies remained inconclusive.ConclusionsIn contemporary practice, evidence showing clinical benefit for preoperative IABP in high-risk patients remains limited and requires further validation in an appropriately sized multicenter randomized trial.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.