• Zhenjun Zhang, Hui Li, Guy R Fogel, Zhenhua Liao, Yang Li, and Weiqiang Liu.
• Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; Biomechanics and Biotechnology Lab, Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
• World Neurosurg. 2018 Mar 1; 111: e581-e591.

BackgroundA porous additive manufactured (AM) cage may provide stability similar to that of traditional solid cages and may be beneficial to bone ingrowth. The biomechanical influence of various porous cages on stability, subsidence, stresses in cage, and facet contact force has not been fully described. The purpose of this study was to verify biomechanical effects of porous AM cages.MethodsThe surgical finite element models with various cages were constructed. The partially porous titanium (PPT) cages and fully porous titanium (FPT) cages were applied. The mechanical parameters of porous materials were obtained by mechanical test. Then the porous AM cages were compared with solid titanium (TI) cage and solid polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. The 4 motion modes were simulated. Range of motion (ROM), cage stress, end plate stress, and facet joint force (FJF) were compared.ResultsFor all the surgical models, ROM decreased by >90%. Compared with TI and PPT cages, PEEK and FPT cages substantially reduced the maximum stresses in cage and end plate in all motion modes. Compared with PEEK cages, the stresses in cage and end plate for FPT cages decreased, whereas the ROM increased. Comparing FPT cages, the stresses in cage and end plate decreased with increasing porosity, whereas ROM increased with increasing porosity. After interbody fusion, FJF was substantially reduced in all motion modes except for flexion.ConclusionsFully porous cages may offer an alternative to solid PEEK cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion. However, it may be prudent to further increase the porosity of the cage.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

32 keywords...

hide…