• Spine J · Mar 2017

    Case Reports Multicenter Study Observational Study

    A multicenter cohort study of spinal osteoid osteomas: results of surgical treatment and analysis of local recurrence.

    • Nasir A Quraishi, Stefano Boriani, Silviu Sabou, Peter P Varga, Alessandro Luzzati, Ziya L Gokaslan, Michael G Fehlings, Charles G Fisher, Mark B Dekutoski, Laurence D Rhines, Jeremy J Reynolds, Niccole M Germscheid, Chetan Bettegowda, and Richard P Williams.
    • Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre Campus of Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. Electronic address: nasquraishi@hotmail.com.
    • Spine J. 2017 Mar 1; 17 (3): 401-408.

    Background ContextSpinal osteoid osteomas are benign primary tumors arising predominantly from the posterior column of the spine. These "osteoblastic" lesions have traditionally been treated with intralesional excision.PurposeThe purpose of the present study was to review the treatment and local recurrence rates for symptomatic spinal osteoid osteomas.Study Design/SettingMulticenter ambispective cross-sectional observational cohort study.Patient SampleDuring the study period, a total of 84 patients (65 males, 19 females) were diagnosed with a spinal osteoid osteoma and received surgical treatment. The mean age at surgery was 21.8 ± 9.0 years (range: 6.7-52.4 years) and the mean follow-up was 2.7 years (13 days-14.5 years).Outcome MeasuresLocal recurrence, perioperative morbidity, and cross-sectional survival.MethodsUsing the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor multicenter ambispective database, surgically treated osteoid osteoma cases were identified. Patient demographic, clinical and diagnostic, treatment, local recurrence, perioperative morbidity, and cross-sectional survival data were collected and retrieved. Descriptive statistics were summarized using mean/standard deviation or frequency/percentage.ResultsIn our study, most of the tumors were localized in the mobile spine (81 of 84 [96%]); all patients reported pain as a symptom. According to the postoperative assessment, 10 (12%) patients received an en bloc resection with marginal or wide margins, whereas two (2%) patients received en bloc resections with intralesional margins, 69 (82%) patients were treated by piecemeal "intralesional" resection, and three (4%) patients were not assessed. A total of six patients (7%) experienced a local recurrence, all of which occurred in patients who had received an intralesional resection.ConclusionsBenign bone-forming tumors of the spine are uncommon. Most patients in our series underwent a piecemeal resection with intralesional margins. This remains safe with a low local recurrence rate. En bloc excision may provide more chance of complete excision of the nidus but is not mandatory. The importance of complete excision of the nidus cannot be overemphasized.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.