-
- Kevin Phan, Jun S Kim, Nathan J Lee, Sulaiman Somani, John Di Capua, Parth Kothari, Dante Leven, and Samuel K Cho.
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Suite 7a, Level 7, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Barker St, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Gate 2, High St, Kensington, New South Wales 2033, Australia.
- Spine J. 2017 Apr 1; 17 (4): 538-544.
Background ContextPrior studies have suggested no significant differences in functional status and postoperative complications of elderly versus nonelderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion; however, similar studies have not been comprehensively investigated in the setting of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).PurposeThe objective was to quantify the ability of the modified Frailty Index (mFI) to predict postoperative events in patients undergoing ALIF.Study DesignSecondary analysis of prospectively collected data.Patient SamplePatients undergoing ALIF in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participant files for the period 2010 through 2014.Outcomes MeasuresOutcome measures included any postoperative complication, return to operating room (OR), and length of stay >5 days.MethodsNSQIP participant files from 2010 to 2014 were used to identify patients undergoing ALIF. The mFI used in the present study is an 11-variable assessment that maps 16 NSQIP variables to 11 variables in the Canadian Study of Health and Ageing Frailty Index. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare the relative strength of association between mFI with outcome variables of interest.ResultsIn total, 3,920 ALIF cases were identified and grouped according to their mFI score: 0 (n=2,025), 0.09 (n=1,382), 0.18 (n=464), or ≥0.27 (n=49). As the mFI increased from 0 (no frailty-associated variables) to 0.27 (4 of 11) or higher, there was a significant stepwise increase in any complication from 10.8% to 32.7%. After multivariable regression analysis, no significant association was found between higher mFI scores with urinary tract infections and venous thromboembolism. High frailty scores were significant predictors of any complication (mFI of ≥0.27 [reference: 0]; OR 2.4; p=.040) and pulmonary complications (mFI score ≥0.27; OR 7.5; p=.001).ConclusionsIn summary, high mFI scores were found to be independently associated with any complication and pulmonary complications in patients who underwent ALIF. The use of mFI together with traditional risk factors may help better identify high-surgical risk patients, which may be useful for preoperative and postoperative care optimization.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.