-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Jul 2012
Comparative StudyAgreement between cardiac outputs by four-dimensional echocardiography and thermodilution method is poor.
- R Bhavsar.
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
- Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul 1;56(6):730-7.
ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to determine the agreement of cardiac output (CO) measured by four-dimensional echocardiography (4D echo) to simultaneously obtain CO from pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) using thermodilution technique.Materials And MethodsSixty-three comparable readings from 27 patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass were included. All echocardiographic measurements were obtained by one experienced echocardiographer. All echo images were analyzed independently and blinded from PAC-obtained measurements. Analysis was primarily done by Bland and Altman plot. The collected data were further controlled for interobserver bias and image quality.ResultsDifferences in CO measurements increased with higher CO, hence values were logarithmically transformed. On the logaritmic scale, the 4D echo underestimated CO by 0.37 l/min compared with PAC, indicating that PAC measurements were 1.45 times higher than the 4D echo (95% confidence interval 1.32-1.52) and limits of agreement 0.97-2.14). The interobserver bias of 4D echo measurement analysis was 0.29 l/min (95% confidence interval 0.16-0.42) and limits of agreement -0.8-1.38). No difference was seen in image quality between comparisons with good agreement compared with comparisons with poor agreement.ConclusionThe agreement between COs by 4D echo and standard PAC thermodilution technique was poor. 4D echo underestimates CO as compared with PAC. This is most likely caused by the analysis software or low frame rate inherent to the technique.© 2012 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica © 2012 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.