• World Neurosurg · Nov 2018

    Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Removal of Pituitary Adenomas: A Surgical Case Series of Treatment Results Using Different 2- and 3-Dimensional Visualization Systems.

    • Shefqet Hajdari, Geralf Kellner, Almuth Meyer, Steffen Rosahl, and Ruediger Gerlach.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
    • World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov 1; 119: e80-e86.

    BackgroundEndoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) is a common treatment for patients with pituitary adenomas (PAs). A disadvantage of endoscopic surgery has been the lack of stereoscopic vision and depth perception. Recent developments offer high-definition 3-dimensional (3D-HD) visualization with a higher resolution and better image quality compared with 3D standard endoscopy (3D-SD). In this study, we compared treatment results of surgically treated patients with PAs using 3 different visualization systems: 2-dimensional (2D)-HD, 3D-SD, and 3D-HD.MethodsData from patients with primary PAs that were surgically treated between December 2008 and December 2017 were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative tumor size and location, perioperative complications, and ophthalmologic, endocrine, and clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsA total of 170 patients underwent endoscopic resection of a primary PA (54 patients with 2D-HD, 75 with 3D-SD, and 41 with 3D-HD). Preoperatively, no statistical differences were found for tumor size, extension, and endocrine and ophthalmologic status. Tumor resection was not statistically different among the 3 groups. Complete resection was performed in 33 patients (80%) in the 3D-HD group, 54 patients (72%) in the 3D-SD group, and 39 patients (72%) in the 2D-HD group. The number of complications was not different across the groups (P = 0.436). Ophthalmologic outcomes did not differ based on EETS technique. The rate of new pituitary insufficiency was slightly lower in the 3D-HD group compared with 2D-HD and 3D-SD groups (4.8%, 16.6%, and 12%, respectively; P = 0.290).ConclusionsAlthough the resection rate was higher in the 3D-HD group, and subjective advantages of the 3D-HD endoscopes were noted, there were no significant differences in terms of gross total resection or new hormonal deficits among the 3 groups.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.