• Jerry J Kim, Edward D Gifford, Ashkan Moazzez, Richard A Sidwell, Mark E Reeves, Thomas H Hartranft, Kenji Inaba, Benjamin T Jarman, Chandrakanth Are, Joseph M Galante, Farin Amersi, Brian R Smith, Marc L Melcher, M Timothy Nelson, Timothy Donahue, Garth Jacobsen, Tracey D Arnell, Steven Lee, Angela Neville, and Christian de Virgilio.
• Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California.
• J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov 1; 72 (6): e236-42.

ObjectiveTo determine the influence of program strategies, such as program directors' (PD) attitudes about the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) and approach to ABSITE preparation, on residents' ABSITE performance.DesignA 17-item questionnaire was sent to PDs at surgical residency programs. The questions were designed to elicit information regarding the educational curriculum, remediation protocols, and opinions relating to the ABSITE. Main outcome measure was categorical resident ABSITE percentile scores from the January 2014 examination. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t-test, analysis of variance, and linear regression as appropriate.SettingThe study was carried out at general surgery residency programs across the country.ParticipantsIn total, 15 general surgery residency PDs participated in the study.ResultsThe PD response rate was 100%. All 460 resident ABSITE scores from the 15 programs were obtained. In total, 10 programs (67%) identified as university affiliated, 4 programs (27%) as independent academic, and 1 program (7%) as hybrid. The mean number of residents per program was 30.7 (range: 15-57). In total, 14 PDs (93%) indicated that an ABSITE review curriculum was in place and 13 PDs (87%) indicated they had a remediation protocol for residents with low ABSITE scores (with differing thresholds of <30th, <35th, and <40th percentile). The median overall ABSITE score for all residents was 61st percentile (interquartile range = 39.5). The mean ABSITE score for each program ranged from 39th to 75th percentile. Program factors associated with higher ABSITE scores included tracking resident reading throughout the year (median 63rd percentile with tracking vs 59th percentile without, p = 0.040) and the type of remediation (by PD: 77th percentile, by PD and faculty: 57th percentile, faculty only: 64th percentile, with Surgical Education and Self-Assessment Program (SESAP): 63rd percentile, outside review course: 43rd percentile; p < 0.001). Programs with a remediation protocol trended toward higher ABSITE scores compared with programs without remediation protocols (median 61st percentile vs 53rd percentile, p = 0.098). Factors not significantly associated with ABSITE performance included number of structured educational hours per week and frequency of ABSITE review sessions.ConclusionsProgram factors appear to significantly influence ABSITE performance. Programs where the PD was actively involved in remediation mentorship and the tracking of resident reading achieved higher ABSITE percentile scores on the January 2014 examination. Counterintuitively, residents from programs with a lower ABSITE threshold for remediation performed better on the examination.Copyright © 2015 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…