• Charles W Hwang, Desmond E Fitzpatrick, Torben K Becker, and Jason M Jones.
• UF Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, 1329 SW 16th Street, PO Box 100186, Gainesville, FL 32610-0186, USA. Electronic address: c7places@ufl.edu.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Mar 1; 37 (3): 482-485.

BackgroundFreestanding emergency departments (FSED) are equipped to care for most emergencies, but do not have all the resources that hospital-based emergency departments (ED) offer. As the number of FSEDs grows rapidly, emergency medical services (EMS) must routinely determine whether a FSED is an appropriate destination. Inappropriate triage may delay definitive care, potentially increasing morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization. We sought to evaluate paramedics' ability in determining whether a FSED is the most appropriate destination.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of two county EMS agencies and two FSEDs over a 25-month period in Alachua and Levy County, Florida, USA. Both EMS agencies allow paramedic discretion in determining transport destination. To determine whether paramedics can correctly identify patients that can be cared for fully at a FSED, our primary outcome was the percentage of patients transported to FSEDs by EMS that were discharged without additional hospital-based resources.ResultsWe identified 1247 EMS patients that had a selected destination of FSED. We excluded patients that did not arrive at their selected FSED destination, left before FSED disposition, or were transferred from the FSED to unaffiliated hospitals. A total of 1184 patients were included for analysis, and 885 (74.7%) did not require additional hospital resources. Comparing the two EMS agencies yielded similar results.ConclusionIn this study, involving two EMS agencies over a 25-month period, we found that 3 out of 4 patients deemed appropriate for transport to a FSED by a paramedic did not require additional hospital-based services.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

19 keywords...

hide…