-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · May 2012
A clinical assessment tool for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.
- S F Sultan, G Iohom, J Saunders, and G Shorten.
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Cork University Hospital and University College Cork, Ireland. sfarjads@gmail.com
- Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 May 1;56(5):616-23.
BackgroundCompetency in anesthesia traditionally has been determined subjectively in practice. Optimal training in procedural skills requires valid and reliable forms of assessment. The objective was to examine a procedure-specific clinical assessment tool for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block for inter-rater reliability and construct validity in a clinical setting.MethodThis was a prospective observational study. Using prior work at our institution, the clinical assessment tool was developed consisting of a 63-point task-specific checklist and a global rating scale. The anesthesiologists were assigned to three groups based on prior experience of performing an axillary block: group 1 ('novices') < 10 procedures, group 2 ('intermediates') 50-80 procedures and group 3 ('experts') > 100 procedures. Each participant performed two consecutive blocks that were videotaped. Two blinded independent experts trained in the marking of the tool evaluated the videotapes.ResultsThere were five participants per group. The inter-rater reliability between assessors was 0.842 and 0.795 for the checklist and global rating scale, respectively. There was a consistent difference between (each pair of) the three groups in terms of both the checklist and global rating scale (P < 0.05). For the checklist, expert vs. intermediate group P = 0.023, expert vs. novice group P < 0.001 and intermediate vs. novice group P = 0.019. For the global rating scale, expert vs. intermediate group P < 0.001, expert vs. novice group gave P < 0.001 and intermediate vs. novice group P = 0.023.ConclusionThe objective of task-specific checklist and global rating scale are reliable and valid measures of axillary block performance between different levels of expertise.© 2012 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica © 2012 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.