• Sergey Spektor, Shifra Fraifeld, Emil Margolin, Sanjith Saseedharan, Daniel Eimerl, and Felix Umansky.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O. Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. Electronic address: sergeyspektor@gmail.com.
• J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Apr 1; 22 (4): 705-12.

AbstractThe sitting position during surgery is thought to provide important advantages, yet it remains controversial. We compared surgical and neurological outcomes for patients operated on in the sitting versus lateral position. Technically difficult procedures performed from the years 2001-2008 for complex lesions in the posterior fossa (vestibular schwannomas, other cerebellopontine angle tumors, foramen magnum meningiomas, brainstem cavernomas, pineal region tumors) were included. Outcomes in the two surgical positions were compared for all 243 patients (93 sitting, 38.3%; 150 lateral, 61.7%) and for 130/243 patients with vestibular schwannomas (50 sitting, 38.5%; 80 lateral, 61.5%). Sitting and lateral patient subgroups were clinically comparable. There were no surgical mortalities. The extent of removal and surgical and neurological outcomes were comparable. We found no advantage in surgical or neurological outcomes for use of the sitting or lateral surgical positions in technically difficult posterior fossa procedures. In vestibular schwannoma surgeries facial nerve preservation (House-Brackmann score 1-2) was related to extent of resection but not to surgical position. The choice of operative position should be based on lesion characteristics and the patient's preoperative medical status as well as the experience and preferences of the surgeons performing the procedure. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

48 keywords...

hide…