• Daniel E Abbott, Jeffrey M Sutton, Peter L Jernigan, Alex Chang, Patrick Frye, Shimul A Shah, Daniel P Schauer, Mark H Eckman, Syed A Ahmad, and Jeffrey J Sussman.
• Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
• J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 1; 113 (7): 784-8.

Background And ObjectivesPasireotide decreases leak rates after pancreatic resection, though significant drug cost may be prohibitive. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine whether prophylactic pasireotide possesses a reasonable cost profile.MethodsA cost-effectiveness model compared pasireotide administration after pancreatic resection versus usual care, populated by probabilities of clinical outcomes from a randomized trial and hospital costs (2013 US$) from a university pancreatic disease center. Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify influential clinical components of the model.ResultsWith the cost of pasireotide included, per patient costs of pancreatectomy, including those for readmission, were lower in the intervention arm (41,769 versus 42,159$; net savings of 390$, or 1%). This was associated with a 56% reduction in pancreatic fistula/pancreatic leak/abscess (PF/PL/A; 21.9-9.2%). Pasireotide cost would need to increase by over 15.4% to make the intervention strategy more costly than usual care. Sensitivity analyses exploring variability of key model inputs demonstrated that the three strongest drivers of cost were (i) cost of pasireotide; (ii) probability of readmission; and (iii) probability of PF/PL/A.ConclusionsProphylactic pasireotide administration following pancreatectomy is cost savings, reducing expensive post-operative sequealae (major complications and readmissions). Pasireotide should be utilized as a cost-saving measure in pancreatic resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:784-788. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

40 keywords...

hide…