• Donald G MacLellan and John P Fletcher.
• Department of Surgery, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
• ANZ J Surg. 2007 Jun 1; 77 (6): 418-23.

AbstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in a substantial number of the Australian community. There exists a considerable range of potential prophylactic measures aimed at reducing the risk of VTE. These antithrombotic regimens include pharmacological interventions and mechanical techniques to counteract venous stasis including graduated compression stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) devices. This review particularly concentrates on evidence for the use of mechanical prophylaxis and the interrelationship with pharmacological methods of VTE prophylaxis. Mechanical and pharmacological methods of VTE prophylaxis are both effective and when used in combination have synergistic effects. Although there are a number of different IPC systems, little evidence is available at present that differentiates these on the basis of VTE prevention. Compliance and patient acceptance of IPC as a preventative measure has improved with miniaturization and device weight reduction. IPC should be used according to recommended guidelines. In moderate-risk patients when pharmacological prophylaxis is contraindicated, IPC can be used as an alternative. High-risk patients should receive both mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis to reduce their relative risk. Until further evidence becomes available, the specific type of IPC unit chosen will generally be determined by ease of use, availability and cost.

12 keywords...

hide…