-
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg · Dec 2019
Validation study of 3D-printed anatomical models using 2 PLA printers for preoperative planning in trauma surgery, a human cadaver study.
- Lars Brouwers, Arno Teutelink, Fiek A J B van Tilborg, de Jongh Mariska A C MAC Clinical Epidemiologist, Brabant Trauma Registry, Network Emergency Care Brabant, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, T, Lansink Koen W W KWW Traumasurgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands., and Mike Bemelman.
- Network Emergency Care Brabant, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands. l.brouwers@etz.nl.
- Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Dec 1; 45 (6): 1013-1020.
Introduction3D printing contributes to a better understanding of the surgical approach, reduction and fixation of complex fractures. It is unclear how a 3D-printed model relates to a human bone. The accuracy of 3D-printed models is important to pre-bend plates and fit of surgical guides. We conduct a validation study in which we compare human cadavers with 3D-printed models to test the accuracy of 3D printing.MethodsNine specimens were scanned, volume rendered into 3D reconstructions and saved as STL data. All models were in a ratio of 1:1 printed on the Ultimaker 3 and Makerbot Replicator Z18. Two independent observers measured all distances between the K-wires on the human cadavers, 2DCT, 3D reconstruction, Meshlab and both printers. A paired Samples T test was used to compare the measurements between the different modalities.ResultsThe least decrease in average distance in millimetres was seen in "the 3D printed pelvis 1", - 0.3 and - 0.8% on respectively the Ultimaker and Makerbot when compared with cadaver Pelvis (1) The 3D model of "Hand 2" showed the most decrease, - 2.5 and - 3.2% on the Ultimaker and Makerbot when compared with cadaver hand (2) Most significant differences in measurements were found in the conversion from 3D file into a 3D print and between the cadaver and 3D-printed model from the Makerbot.ConclusionOur 3D printing process results in accurate models suitable for preoperative workup. The Ultimaker 3 is slightly more accurate than the Makerbot Replicator Z18. We advise that medical professionals should perform a study that tests the accuracy of their 3D printing process before using the 3D-printed models in medical practice.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.