• Br J Anaesth · Sep 2018

    Clinical Trial

    Usefulness of the pain sensitivity questionnaire to discriminate the pain behaviour of chronic pain patients.

    • T Tuna, L Van Obbergh, N Van Cutsem, and E Engelman.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: turgay.tuna@erasme.ulb.ac.be.
    • Br J Anaesth. 2018 Sep 1; 121 (3): 616-622.

    BackgroundChronic pain is no longer an effective warning system, but a syndrome with co-morbidities and many causes, needing a careful evaluation. Questions remain about the pain behaviour of chronic pain patients compared with patients with acute pain, or healthy subjects that we investigated.MethodsWe compared three populations: healthy (HS, n=280), with acute pain (AP=110 patients), and chronic pain (CP=280 patients) by assessing their pain behaviour with the pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ-total and PSQ-minor). The influence of central sensitisation syndrome (CSS) on chronic pain behaviour, including catastrophising, was further investigated by using the central sensitisation inventory.ResultsCompared with the AP patients and HS, the CP patients exhibited significantly higher catastrophising scores; higher PSQ-minor scores [29.0 (21.0-39.0), than for AP 24.0 (14.0-32.5), and for healthy subjects 25.0 (17.0-34.0); and PSQ-total scores of for CP, 63.5 for AP, and 64.0 for HS. No significant difference was observed between the HS and AP populations. Significant differences were observed between the CP patients with and without CSS. The median PSQ-minor for patients with CSS was 33.0 and without CSS was 25.0 (P<0.05); the median PSQ-total for patients with CSS was 82.0 and without CSS was 65 (P<0.05). The CP patients without CSS did not show any significant difference compared with the AP and HS groups, except for catastrophising.ConclusionsThis study highlights the influence of CSS in the results of PSQ and catastrophising by chronic pain patients in comparison with healthy controls and acute pain patients.Clinical Trial RegistrationP2014/134.Copyright © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.