• Chest · Sep 2018

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Can Patients With COPD Assimilate Disease-Specific Information During an Acute Exacerbation?: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

    • Tania Janaudis-Ferreira, Sylvia Jocelyn Carr, Samantha L Harrison, Andrea S Gershon, Siobhan C Milner, Sean Carr, David Fishbein, and Roger Goldstein.
    • School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Translational Research in Respiratory Diseases Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Respiratory Medicine, West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: Tania.janaudis-ferreira@mcgill.ca.
    • Chest. 2018 Sep 1; 154 (3): 588-596.

    BackgroundThe study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an introductory disease-specific educational program delivered during an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) on objective measures of disease-specific knowledge.MethodsPatients admitted to a community hospital with an AECOPD were randomly assigned to a control group (standard care) or intervention group (standard care + brief education). The intervention group received two 30-min education sessions in hospital or at home within 2 weeks of hospital admission. Feasibility measures included the number of eligible patients, compliance with the sessions, and number of follow-up measures completed. Disease-specific knowledge and informational needs were measured using the Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ) and the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ), respectively, before and after the intervention period.ResultsThirty-one patients (mean age, 72 ± 10 years) with an AECOPD participated in the study. Of 102 approached patients, 75 consented to screening (73.5%) and 67 (66%) were eligible for the study. Thirty-four patients declined participation. All intervention patients (n = 15) completed the educational sessions and follow-up measures. Three patients (control group) did not complete the follow-up measures. The mean changes and SDs for the BCKQ in the intervention and control groups were 8 ± 5.14 and 3.4 ± 4.9, respectively (P = .02). No difference between groups was found for the LINQ (P = .80).ConclusionsA brief educational program delivered at the time of hospitalization for an AECOPD was feasible for a subset of patients, resulted in improved disease-specific knowledge, and may be a bridge to more active approaches.Trial RegistryClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02321215; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.Copyright © 2018 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…