• Louise Rose, Laura Istanboulian, Orla M Smith, Soledad Silencieux, Brian H Cuthbertson, AmaralAndre Carlos Kajdacsy-BallaACKSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto M4N 3M5, Canada; University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto M5T 1P8, Canada., Ian Fraser, Joanne Grey, and Craig Dale.
• Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto M4N 3M5, Canada; University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto M5T 1P8, Canada; Michael Garron Hospital, 825 Coxwell Ave, Toronto M4C 3E7, Canada; Kings College London, 57 Waterloo Bridge Rd, London. Electronic address: louise.rose@utoronto.ca.
• J Crit Care. 2018 Oct 1; 47: 109113109-113.

PurposeTo assess feasibility of producing intelligible and comprehensible speech with an electrolarynx; measure anxiety, communication ease, and satisfaction before/after electrolarynx training; and identify barriers/facilitators.MethodsWe included tracheostomized adults from 3 units following commands, reading English, and mouthing words. On enrolment, we measured anxiety, ease, and satisfaction with communication. We gave electrolarynx instruction for ≤5 days then 2 independent raters assessed intelligibility, sentence comprehensibility (9-point difficulty scale), and Electrolarynx Effectiveness Score (EES), and re-evaluated anxiety, communication ease, and satisfaction. Interviews explored barriers/facilitators.Measurements And Main ResultsWe recruited 24 participants (Jan2015-Dec2016). Mean (SD) intelligibility was 45%(18%) words correct: 57%(21%) when facing. Mean comprehension difficulty was 6.4(2.0) overall, indicating moderate difficulty (5.5(2.5) scored visualizing). Mean EES was 2.9(1.0) (3 = improved lip-reading through recognizable sounds). Anxiety decreased from median 3.8 to 2.0 (P = .007). Communication was rated easier (median 15 vs 12, P = .04) whereas satisfaction remained similar (P = .06). Facilitators included device friendliness, patient independence, and word intelligibility. Barriers were patient weakness, difficulty positioning the device, and limited sentence as opposed to word intelligibility.ConclusionThe electrolarynx may aid intelligible speech for some tracheostomized patients if the communication partner can visualize the users face, and reduce anxiety and make patient perceived communication easier.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

24 keywords...

hide…