• Mitchell P Wilson, Cian O'Kelly, Andrew S Jack, and Jeremy Rempel.
• 1Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, and.
• J. Neurosurg. 2019 Jun 1; 130 (6): 204820542048-2054.

ObjectiveFreehand insertion of external ventricular drains (EVDs) using anatomical landmarks is considered the primary method for placement, although alternative techniques have shown improved accuracy in positioning. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate which features of the baseline clinical history and preprocedural CT scan predict EVD positioning into suboptimal and unsatisfactory locations when using the freehand insertion technique.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed evaluating 189 consecutive adult patients who received an EVD via freehand technique through an anterior burr hole between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, at a Level 1 trauma facility in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome measures included features associated with suboptimal positioning (Kakarla grade 1 vs Kakarla grades 2 and 3). The secondary outcome measures were features associated with unsatisfactory positioning (Kakarla grades 1 and 2 vs Kakarla grade 3).ResultsFifty-one EVDs (27%) were suboptimally positioned. Fifteen (8%) EVDs were placed into eloquent cortex or nontarget CSF spaces. Admitting diagnosis, head height-to-width ratio in axial plane, and side of predominant pathology were found to be significantly associated with suboptimal placement (p = 0.02, 0.012, and 0.02, respectively). A decreased height-to-width ratio was also associated with placement into only eloquent cortex and/or nontarget CSF spaces (p = 0.003).ConclusionsFreehand insertion of an EVD is associated with significant suboptimal positioning into parenchyma and nontarget CSF spaces. The likelihood of inaccurate EVD placement can be predicted with baseline clinical and radiographic features. The patient's height-to-width ratio represents a novel potential radiographic predictor for malpositioning.

5 keywords...

hide…