• Brooks Udelsman, Isabel Chien, Kei Ouchi, Kate Brizzi, James A Tulsky, and Charlotta Lindvall.
• 1 Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
• J Palliat Med. 2019 Feb 1; 22 (2): 179-182.

BackgroundAlone, administrative data poorly identifies patients with palliative care needs.ObjectiveTo identify patients with uncommon, yet devastating, illnesses using a combination of administrative data and natural language processing (NLP).Design/SettingRetrospective cohort study using the electronic medical records of a healthcare network totaling over 2500 hospital beds. We sought to identify patient populations with two unique disease processes associated with a poor prognosis: pneumoperitoneum and leptomeningeal metastases from breast cancer.MeasurementsPatients with pneumoperitoneum or leptomeningeal metastasis from breast cancer were identified through administrative codes and NLP.ResultsAdministrative codes alone resulted in identification of 6438 patients with possible pneumoperitoneum and 557 patients with possible leptomeningeal metastasis. Adding NLP to this analysis reduced the number of patients to 869 with pneumoperitoneum and 187 with leptomeningeal metastasis secondary to breast cancer. Administrative codes alone yielded a 13% positive predictive value (PPV) for pneumoperitoneum and 25% PPV for leptomeningeal metastasis. The combination of administrative codes and NLP achieved a PPV of 100%. The entire process was completed within hours.ConclusionsAdding NLP to the use of administrative codes allows for rapid identification of seriously ill patients with otherwise difficult to detect disease processes and eliminates costly, tedious, and time-intensive manual chart review. This method enables studies to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment, including palliative interventions, for unique populations of seriously ill patients who cannot be identified by administrative codes alone.

25 keywords...

hide…