• Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah, Kirsten E Stoner, Liesl N Close, Nicole A DeVries Watson, Oliver E Flouty, Nicole M Grosland, and Matthew A Howard.
• Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
• World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct 1; 118: e414-e421.

BackgroundThe decompressive hemicraniectomy operation is highly effective in relieving refractory intracranial hypertension. However, one limitation of this treatment strategy is the requirement to perform a subsequent cranioplasty operation to reconstruct the skull defect-an expensive procedure with high complication rates. An implant that is capable of accommodated post-hemicraniectomy brain swelling, but also provides acceptable skull defect coverage after brain swelling abates, would theoretically eliminate the need for the cranioplasty operation. In an earlier report, the concept of using a thin, moveable plate implant for this purpose was introduced.MethodsMeasurements were obtained in a series of stroke patients to determine whether a plate offset from the skull by 5 mm would accommodate the observed post-hemicraniectomy brain swelling. The volume of brain swelling measured in all patients in the stroke series would be accommodated by a 5-mm offset plate. In the current report, we expanded our analysis to study brain swelling patterns in a different population of patients requiring a hemicraniectomy operation: those with traumatic brain injuries (TBI).ResultsWe identified 56 patients with TBI and measured their postoperative brain herniation volumes. A moveable plate offset by 5 mm would create sufficient additional volume to accommodate the brain swelling measured in all but one patient. That patient had malignant intraoperative brain swelling and died the following day.ConclusionsThese data suggest that a 5 mm offset plate will provide sufficient volume for brain expansion for almost all hemicraniectomy operations.Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

27 keywords...

hide…