• Judith A McInnes, Heather Cleland, Lincoln M Tracy, Anne Darton, Fiona M Wood, Tracey Perrett, and Belinda J Gabbe.
• Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 3, 553 St. Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia. Electronic address: Judy.mcinnes@monash.edu.
• Burns. 2019 Mar 1; 45 (2): 484-493.

BackgroundBurn injuries to workers can have a devastating impact, however knowledge of the epidemiology of work-related burn injuries in Australia and New Zealand is limited.PurposeTo describe epidemiological characteristics of work-related burn injuries in Australia and New Zealand, and to compare these with non-work-related burns.MethodsAdult burn injury data, 2009-2016, were extracted from the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic, injury, management and outcome characteristics. Differences between work-related and non-work-related injuries were assessed using Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.ResultsOf 10,574 adult patients treated in burn centres in Australia and New Zealand, 2009-2016, 17% had work-related burns. Most work-related cases were male (85%), less than 35 years old (53%), and had sustained flame (33%), scald (30%) or chemicals (17%) burns. Proportions of chemical, scald and electrical burns were greater for work-related than for non-work-related burns, with this being most marked for chemical and electrical burns (17% vs. 3% and 7% vs. 1%, respectively).ConclusionsAlmost one in five cases of working-aged people admitted to Australian and New Zealand burns centres was work-related. Through identification of vulnerable groups, this study informs policy and strategies to minimise occupational burn risk.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

38 keywords...

hide…