• World Neurosurg · Aug 2018

    Endoscopic Endonasal Reconstruction of Anterior Skull Base Defects: What Factors Really Affect the Outcomes?

    • Mario Turri-Zanoni, Jacopo Zocchi, Alessia Lambertoni, Marta Giovannardi, Apostolos Karligkiotis, Paolo Battaglia, Davide Locatelli, and Paolo Castelnuovo.
    • Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy; Head and Neck Surgery & Forensic Dissection Research Center, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy. Electronic address: tzmario@inwind.it.
    • World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug 1; 116: e436-e443.

    ObjectiveEndoscopic endonasal surgery has evolved in recent decades, requiring comparable advances in reconstructive techniques. This study aimed to retrospectively review outcomes of endoscopic anterior skull base reconstruction and to analyze factors associated with failures.MethodsData from patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal anterior skull base reconstruction in a single institution between 1998 and 2017 were collected. Patients were stratified according to selected risk factors: sex; age; previous surgery; disease treated (cerebrospinal fluid leaks, benign tumors, malignant tumors); single or multiple defects; defect dimension (<1 cm2, 1-2 cm2, 2-6 cm2, >6 cm2) and site (olfactory cleft, ethmoidal roof, planum sphenoidalis, posterior wall of frontal sinus); reconstruction technique (overlay graft, multilayer grafts, pedicled flap) and materials used; postoperative radiotherapy; and year of surgery. Statistical significance was assessed using Fisher exact test. Univariate logistic regression was implemented to analyze the association between risk factors and failures.ResultsInclusion criteria were met by 513 cases with median follow-up of 96 months (range, 12-257 months). Success rate for initial repair was 95% (487/513), with 100% success rate for secondary closure after revision surgery. Failures were not significantly related to sex (P = 0.54), reconstruction technique (P = 0.28), location of defect (P = 0.65), dimension (P = 0.69), disease (P = 0.83), or postoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.83). Year of surgery, considered as a continuous variable, was associated with a statistically significant reduction of failures (odds ratio = 0.89, P = 0.005).ConclusionsEndoscopic surgery is safe and effective for anterior skull base reconstruction. Refinements in surgical technique and increasing experience have contributed to improved success rates.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…