• Shigeomi Yokoya, Akihiko Hino, Yukihiro Goto, and Hideki Oka.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital, Imperial Gift Foundation Inc., Ritto, Shiga, Japan. Electronic address: yokoya@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp.
• World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct 1; 118: e185-e187.

ObjectiveIn direct aneurysm surgery, tentative clipping is frequently applied to facilitate aneurysm dissection. However, no systemic review on the pros and cons of tentative clipping has been conducted. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and concerns of tentative clipping.MethodsA total of 867 direct clippings in 737 patients were performed to treat intracranial aneurysms between 1994 and 2015. We retrospectively investigated the frequency, purpose, location, and adequacy of tentative clipping.ResultsTentative clipping was performed in 149 of the 867 aneurysms that were clipped (17.2%). The purpose of tentative clipping was to dissect an aneurysm in 141 (94.6%), separate the vessels from the surface of a sac in 5 (3.4%), and prevent slipping of the final clip in 3 (2.0%) cases. Further dissection revealed that tentative clipping completely excluded the blood flow into the aneurysm in 126 (84.6%) of the 149 cases and incompletely shut it out in 23 (15.4%) cases. Five (21.7%) of the 23 patients with incomplete clipping had intraoperative aneurysm ruptures subsequently.ConclusionsTentative clipping facilitates dissection of the aneurysm sac from the surrounding structure but can occasionally lead to intraoperative rupture. Before applying tentative clips, surgeons should prepare for temporary clipping or additional tentative clipping in case of a rupture.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…