-
- Joonho Byun, Young-Hoon Kim, Soo Jung Nam, Ji Eun Park, Young Hyun Cho, Ho Sung Kim, Seok Ho Hong, Jeong Hoon Kim, Sang Joon Kim, and Chang Jin Kim.
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- World Neurosurg. 2019 Jan 1; 121: e858-e866.
ObjectivesGross total resection for glioblastoma (GBM) has been associated with better prognosis. However, it is not always feasible, and the threshold for the extent of resection required for better prognosis has been controversial. Therefore, we compared the survival and clinical outcomes of patients with GBM who had undergone partial resection (PR) or biopsy.MethodsOf the 110 patients, 32 and 78, who had undergone PR and biopsy, respectively, were enrolled to identify any differences in clinical outcomes. No differences were found in patient demographics between the 2 groups, except for tumor location and mean tumor volume (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). Propensity score matching between the PR and biopsy groups was performed, in which 20 patients each in the PR and biopsy groups were matched.ResultsThe overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly between the PR and biopsy groups (P = 0.84 and P = 0.48, respectively). After propensity score matching, the differences in OS and PFS between the 2 groups were still not statistically significant (P = 0.51 and P = 0.75, respectively). The hazard ratios for OS and PFS for the PR group compared with biopsy were 0.98 and 0.73, respectively; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.96 and P = 0.39, respectively). The surgical complication rate was greater in the PR group (14 of 32; 43.7%) than in the biopsy group (9 of 78; 11.5%; P < 0.01).ConclusionsPR failed to improve survival compared with biopsy for patients with GBM. Moreover, the surgical complication rate in the PR group was greater than that in the biopsy group.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.