• Steffen Naegel, Josephine Biermann, Nina Theysohn, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Hans-Christoph Diener, Zaza Katsarava, Mark Obermann, and Dagny Holle.
• Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany. steffen.naegel@uk-essen.de.
• J Headache Pain. 2018 Oct 24; 19 (1): 99.

BackgroundTo enrich the hitherto insufficient understanding regarding the mechanisms of action of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in pain disorders, we investigated its modulating effects on cerebral pain processing using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).MethodsThirteen right-handed healthy participants received 20 min of 1.5 mA tDCS applied over the primary motor cortex thrice and under three different stimulation pattern (1.anodal-tDCS, 2.cathodal-tDCS, and 3.sham-tDCS) in a blinded cross-over design. After tDCS neural response to electric trigeminal-nociceptive stimulation was investigated using a block designed fMRI.ResultsPain stimulation showed a distinct activation pattern within well-established brain regions associated with pain processing. Following anodal tDCS increased activation was detected in the thalamus, basal ganglia, amygdala, cingulate, precentral, postcentral, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, while cathodal t-DCS showed decreased response in these areas (pFWE < 0.05). Interestingly the observed effect was reversed in both control conditions (visual- and motor-stimulation). Behavioral data remained unchanged irrespective of the tDCS stimulation mode.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates polarity-specific modulation of cerebral pain processing, in reconfirmation of previous electrophysiological data. Anodal tDCS leads to an activation of the central pain-network while cathodal tDCS does not. Results contribute to a network-based understanding of tDCS's impact on cerebral pain-processing.

22 keywords...

hide…