• World Neurosurg · Feb 2019

    Comparative Study

    Differences in the electrophysiological monitoring results of spinal cord arteriovenous and intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations.

    • Xiaoyu Li, Hong-Qi Zhang, Feng Ling, Chuan He, and Jian Ren.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Beijing, China.
    • World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 1; 122: e315-e324.

    ObjectiveSpinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs) and intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations (ISCCMs) have a very low incidence of disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in electrophysiologic monitoring in these 2 surgeries.MethodsThe study included 109 patients (SAVMs, n = 55; ISCCMs, n = 54) recruited from November 2012 to January 2016. All patients underwent electrophysiologic monitoring during the entire operation, including somatosensory-evoked potentials, motor-evoked potentials, and electromyography. We used an amplitude reduction of >80% as warning criterion for motor-evoked potentials and an amplitude reduction of more than 50% and latency prolongation of more than 10% as warning criteria for somatosensory-evoked potentials.ResultsIn our study, the sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative monitoring during SAVM surgery were 77.3% and 87.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative monitoring during ISCCM surgery were 68.8% and 83.3%, respectively. We found that 21 patients with SAVM showed permanent changes, 17 had immediate postoperative impairment, 8 recovered before discharge, and 5 showed neurologic deficits at long-term follow-up. Of the 17 patients with ISCCMs showing permanent changes, 11 had immediate postoperative impairment, 5 recovered before discharge, and 2 had long-term residual neurologic deficits.ConclusionsElectrophysiological monitoring provides effective guidance during operation on spinal vascular malformations. Electrophysiologic monitoring revealed that surgical resection of SAVMs resulted in more permanent changes and postoperative dysfunction when compared with ISCCMs. The incidence of both false-positive and -negative results suggests that electrophysiologic monitoring cannot fully predict the complete function of the patients.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.