• Robert Meek, Michaela J Mee, Diana Egerton-Warburton, Andis Graudins, Alastair Meyer, Pourya Pouryahya, Gabriel Blecher, James Fahey, and Sallyanne Crow.
• Emergency Medicine Program, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
• Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 1; 26 (8): 867-877.

ObjectiveThe objective was to separately compare effectiveness of 1.25 mg of intravenous (IV) droperidol and 8 mg of IV ondansetron with 0.9% saline placebo for adult emergency department (ED) patients with nausea. A novel primary outcome measure, expected to aid clinical interpretation of reported results, was employed.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted at the three EDs of Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia. The design was to demonstrate superiority of the active drugs over placebo. The primary outcome measure of symptom improvement was defined as a visual analog scale (VAS) rating change of -8 mm or more from baseline at 30 minutes posttreatment. Mean VAS changes per group and percentages experiencing the desired treatment effect were also compared. The study was concluded after recruitment of 215 of the planned 378 patients, as interim analysis confirmed that continuation could not result in a finding of superiority.ResultsOf 215 patients, 73 (34%), 71 (33%), and 71 (33%) received droperidol, ondansetron, and placebo. Symptom improvement occurred in 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64% to 85%), 80% (95% CI = 69% to 89%), and 76% (95% CI = 64% to 85%), respectively. Mean VAS changes were -29 mm (95% CI = -36 to -23 mm), -34 mm (95% CI = -41 to -28 mm), and -24 mm (95% CI = -29 to -19 mm), respectively. Desired treatment effects were experienced by 77% (95% CI = 65% to 86%), 73% (95% CI = 61% to 83%), and 59% (95% CI = 47% to 71%), respectively.ConclusionFor adult ED patients with nausea, superiority was not demonstrated for droperidol or ondansetron over placebo.© 2018 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

23 keywords...

hide…