• Steven L Shein, Justin Hotz, and Robinder G Khemani.
• Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH.
• Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2019 Jan 1; 20 (1): e15-e22.

ObjectivesTo derive and validate a score that correlates with an objective measurement of a child's effort of breathing.DesignSecondary analysis of a previously conducted observational study.SettingThe pediatric and cardiothoracic ICUs of a quaternary-care children's hospital.PatientsPatients more than 37 weeks gestational age to age 18 years who were undergoing extubation.InterventionsEffort of breathing was measured in patients following extubation using esophageal manometry to calculate pressure rate product. Simultaneously, members of a multidisciplinary team (nurse, physician, and respiratory therapist) assessed respiratory function using a previously validated tool. Elements of the tool that were significantly associated with pressure rate product in univariate analysis were identified and included in a multivariate model. An Effort of Breathing score was derived from the results of the model using data from half of the subjects (derivation cohort) and then validated using data from the remaining subjects (validation cohort) by calculating the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for pressure rate product greater than 90th percentile and for the need for reintubation.Measurements And Main ResultsAmong 409 subjects, the median age was 5 months, and nearly half were cardiac surgery patients (49.1%). Retractions, stridor, and pulsus paradoxus were included in the Simple Score. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for pressure rate product greater than 90th percentile was 0.8359 (95% CI, 0.7996-0.8722) in the derivation cohort and 0.7930 (0.7524-0.8337) in the validation cohort. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for reintubation was 0.7280 (0.6807-0.7752) when all scores were analyzed individually and was 0.7548 (0.6644-0.8452) if scores from three clinicians from different disciplines were summated. Results were similar regardless of provider discipline or training.ConclusionsA scoring system was derived and validated, performed acceptably to predict increased effort of breathing or need for advanced respiratory support and may function best when used by a team.

19 keywords...

hide…