• Clinical nutrition ESPEN · Jun 2018

    The use of computed tomography images as a prognostic marker in critically ill cancer patients.

    • Diogo O Toledo, Amanda M Carvalho, Amanda M R R Oliveira, Jerusa M Toloi, Aline C Silva, Francisco de Mattos Farah José J Department of Surgery, Hopsital Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil., Carla M Prado, and Joao M Silva.
    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: diogootoledo@gmail.com.
    • Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018 Jun 1; 25: 114-120.

    Background & AimsIn the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, body composition is typically estimated through anthropometry, which does not specifically quantify skeletal muscle (SM). Recent findings have shown that computed tomography (CT) is a useful tool to identify low SM in critically ill patients, which in turn is associated with poor clinical outcomes. So, the present study aims at comparing low SM assessed by CT to BMI anthropometric data and its association with outcomes in critically ill patients.MethodsObservational study was used, which included >18 year-old patients, with over 72 h of ICU length of stay, who had an abdominal CT at ICU admission. Demographic, body mass index (BMI), hospital outcomes and abdominal CT data (SM and adipose tissue at the 3rd lumbar vertebrae) were collected for analysis. ROC curve optimal stratification analysis for hospital mortality was applied to classify people into low SM (sarcopenic) versus normal SM (non-sarcopenic). A Cox regression was applied to find independent associations between sarcopenia and 30-day survival.ResultsThe study involved 99 patients, 56% male, mean-age of 61.6 years old, BMI 24.19 ± 4.49 kg/m2; hospital mortality was 26%. According to BMI, 19.4% of the patients were underweight. However, a poor correlation was observed between BMI and SM index by CT: R2 = 0.39, P < 0.001. The cutoff point for determining sarcopenia by CT was 41.2 cm2/m2 (sensitivity 70%, specificity 69.5%, AUC 70.3) for both sexes. The sarcopenia diagnosis by CT as nutritional evaluation parameters was correlated with malnutrition BMI diagnosis in only 35.5%. When compared to non-sarcopenic patients, those with sarcopenia presented worse 30-day survival adjusted by age and SAPS 3 (HR = 2.74, 95%CI = 1.02-7.35, P = 0.04), higher hospital mortality (41.9% vs 14.6%, P = 0.006) and ICU non-infectious complications (76.7% vs 52.1%, P = 0.016).ConclusionSarcopenia assessed by abdominal CT demonstrated low correlation with BMI and was a risk factor for lower 30-day survival, higher hospital mortality and higher complications in critically ill patients.Copyright © 2018 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…