• Haisong Yang, Jingchuan Sun, Jiangang Shi, Yongfei Guo, Bing Zheng, Yuan Wang, Ximing Xu, and Guodong Shi.
• Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
• Eur Spine J. 2019 Feb 1; 28 (2): 370-379.

PurposeTo compare the incidence rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage between anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) with dura ossification (DO).MethodsIn the period from June 2015 to June 2017, ACAF and ACCF were performed on patients with OPLL with DO. Double-layer sign was observed on axial bone window of CT images. The operation duration, blood loss, and hospital stay were measured. Radiologic assessment included occupying rate, type and extent of OPLL, decompression width, postoperative area of the spinal canal, and anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord. The JOA scoring system was used to evaluate the neurological status. Surgery-related complications such as CSF leakage and spinal cord or nerve injury were all recorded.ResultsThere were 28 patients in ACAF group and 31 in ACCF group. On cross-sectional CT, decompression width and postoperative spinal canal area were both significantly larger in the ACAF group than that in the ACCF group (P < 0.01). The anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord was significantly larger in the ACAF group (P < 0.05). Mean JOA score was better in the ACAF group (P < 0.05). In the ACCF group, seven (22.6%) patients had CSF leakage. However, only one (3.6%) presented with CSF leakage in the ACAF group. The difference of incidence rate of CSF leakage was significant (P < 0.01).ConclusionsACAF, which can significantly reduce CSF leakage and achieve good neurological recovery, is a good option to treat cervical OPLL with DO. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

21 keywords...

hide…