• Lancet · Jun 2018

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation to treat hypertension (RADIANCE-HTN SOLO): a multicentre, international, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.

    • Michel Azizi, Roland E Schmieder, Felix Mahfoud, Michael A Weber, Joost Daemen, Justin Davies, Jan Basile, Ajay J Kirtane, Yale Wang, Melvin D Lobo, Manish Saxena, Lida Feyz, Florian Rader, Philipp Lurz, Jeremy Sayer, Marc Sapoval, Terry Levy, Kintur Sanghvi, Josephine Abraham, SharpAndrew S PASPRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK., Naomi D L Fisher, Michael J Bloch, Helen Reeve-Stoffer, Leslie Coleman, Christopher Mullin, Laura Mauri, and RADIANCE-HTN Investigators.
    • Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France; Hypertension Department and DHU PARC, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France; INSERM CIC1418, Paris, France.
    • Lancet. 2018 Jun 9; 391 (10137): 233523452335-2345.

    BackgroundEarly studies suggest that radiofrequency-based renal denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with moderate hypertension. We investigated whether an alternative technology using endovascular ultrasound renal denervation reduces ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications.MethodsRADIANCE-HTN SOLO was a multicentre, international, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial done at 21 centres in the USA and 18 in Europe. Patients with combined systolic-diastolic hypertension aged 18-75 years were eligible if they had ambulatory blood pressure greater than or equal to 135/85 mm Hg and less than 170/105 mm Hg after a 4-week discontinuation of up to two antihypertensive medications and had suitable renal artery anatomy. Patients were randomised (1:1) to undergo renal denervation with the Paradise system (ReCor Medical, Palo Alto, CA, USA) or a sham procedure consisting of renal angiography only. The randomisation sequence was computer generated and stratified by centres with randomised blocks of four or six and permutation of treatments within each block. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to randomisation. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 2 months in the intention-to-treat population. Patients were to remain off antihypertensive medications throughout the 2 months of follow-up unless specified blood pressure criteria were exceeded. Major adverse events included all-cause mortality, renal failure, an embolic event with end-organ damage, renal artery or other major vascular complications requiring intervention, or admission to hospital for hypertensive crisis within 30 days and new renal artery stenosis within 6 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02649426.FindingsBetween March 28, 2016, and Dec 28, 2017, 803 patients were screened for eligibility and 146 were randomised to undergo renal denervation (n=74) or a sham procedure (n=72). The reduction in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure was greater with renal denervation (-8·5 mm Hg, SD 9·3) than with the sham procedure (-2·2 mm Hg, SD 10·0; baseline-adjusted difference between groups: -6·3 mm Hg, 95% CI -9·4 to -3·1, p=0·0001). No major adverse events were reported in either group.InterpretationCompared with a sham procedure, endovascular ultrasound renal denervation reduced ambulatory blood pressure at 2 months in patients with combined systolic-diastolic hypertension in the absence of medications.FundingReCor Medical.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.