• G Stellin, S Y Ho, R H Anderson, J R Zuberbuhler, and R D Siewers.
• Department of Paediatrics, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom.
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1991 Dec 1; 102 (6): 849-55.

AbstractIn describing hearts with double-outlet right ventricle, we have had problems with how best to use the term noncommitted as applied to the ventricular septal defect. We reviewed, therefore, 63 hearts with double-outlet right ventricle in the setting of usual atrial arrangement and a concordant atrioventricular connection. From these, 18 hearts with potentially noncommitted defects were identified and studied in detail. The defect was unequivocally remote from the ventricular outflow tracts in 16 of these hearts, being perimembranous with excavation to open into the inlet of the right ventricle in 12, two of these also having straddling of an atrioventricular valve. One heart had a muscular defect situated in the inlet part of the muscular septum, whereas the defect was the ventricular component of an atrioventricular septal defect in the other three. In the remaining two hearts the defect was anatomically juxtaposed to a subarterial outlet. The pathway to the outflow tract, however, was obstructed by leaflets of a straddling valve. Our study shows, therefore, the need to distinguish between anatomic "commitment" of the defect from the problems in terms of commitment that may confront the surgeon in the operating room. Not only does the distance between the interventricular communication and one of the subarterial outflow tract need to be assessed (the anatomic commitment), but also the presence and nature of any intervening extraneous tissues (the surgical commitment) requires assessment.

4 keywords...

hide…