• Dale N Segal, Zachary J Grabel, Jacob M Wilson, Andrew H Milby, Weilong J Shi, William C Hutton, and John M Rhee.
• Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Electronic address: Dsegal2@emory.edu.
• World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 1; 122: e881-e889.

ObjectiveCervical total disk replacement (TDR) has emerged as a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical diskectomy fusion (ACDF). Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the TDR preserves motion at the diseased segment and minimizes motion and stress at adjacent segments compared with fusion. There has been growing interest in performing a TDR adjacent to a cervical fusion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the kinematics of a TDR after sequentially fusing adjacent segments.MethodsSeven fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spine specimens from C1-T1 were used (average age, 56.2 ± 7.3 years). The effect on cervical flexion-extension motion, by instrumenting a TDR above or below a 1-, 2-, or 3-level fusion, was measured. The protocol consisted of taking fluoroscopic images of each cervical specimen obtained at maximal angular displacement in flexion and extension during force application. Cobb angles were measured on digital radiographs to determine flexion-extension range of motion (ROM).ResultsSegmental ROM of the C6-7 TDR in the unfused spine was 11.3° ± 1.9°. After performing a 3-level fusion at C3-6, the motion of the C6-7 TDR increased to 12.9° ± 1.3° (P = 0.33). ROM of the C2-3 TDR in the unfused spine was 5.0° ± 1.1°. After performing a 3-level fusion of C3-6, the C2-3 TDR segmental motion was 6.1° ± 1.3° (P = 0.09).ConclusionsBiomechanically performing a cervical TDR adjacent to a long-segment fusion did not subject the implant to significantly greater motion than when the TDR was instrumented alone.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

26 keywords...

hide…