-
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Dec 2004
Clinical outcomes in the revision of unicondylar arthoplasties to bicondylar arthroplasties. A matched-pair study.
- Roland Becker, Michael John, and Wolfram H Neumann.
- Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 45, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany. roland.becker@medizin.uni-magdeburg.de.
- Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Dec 1; 124 (10): 702-7.
IntroductionThe aim of the following study was to find out how much a previously implanted unicondylar prosthesis affects the clinical and functional outcome of a total knee arthroplasty in case of revision surgery.Materials And MethodsA matched-pair comparative analysis was performed on 28 patients (group A) who required bicondylar knee arthroplasty following failed unicondylar arthroplasty and 28 patients (group B) with primary bicondylar knee arthroplasty. Both groups were matched according to age, sex, weight, height, type of prosthesis, and follow-up time after bicondylar arthroplasty. The patients' evaluation was based on the Knee Society Score and the WOMAC Score. Radiographs (AP weight-bearing and lateral) were taken of the knee. The average follow-up time after bicondylar arthroplasty was 55+/-15 months in group A and 56+/-13 months in group B.ResultsThe knee score was 71.8+/-18 and 80.4+/-10 points (p=0.01) and the function score 56.1+/-15 and 64.1+/-19 points (p=0.1) for group A and group B, respectively. The subjective assessment according to the WOMAC Score was statistically significant in terms of the functional outcome. Increased postoperative range of motion of 109 degrees +/-11 degrees was noticed for group B in comparison with group A (101 degrees +/-8 degrees ; p=0.004). Patients revised from an unicondylar arthroplasty required a significantly thicker polyethylene inlay (12.9+/-3 mm) compared with the primarily implanted group (10.3+/-3 mm; p=0.004).ConclusionRevision of an unicondylar to a bicondylar knee replacement showed inferior functional results in comparison to primary bicondylar knee arthroplasty. Patients are satisfied after conversion of an unicondylar to bicondylar prosthesis, but not quite as much as patients who received a primary bicondylar arthroplasty. However, in the small number of patients where revision surgery after failed unicondylar prosthesis is required, the patient had already been successfully treated for many years.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.