• Jason E Moore, John M Oropello, Daniel Stoltzfus, Henry Masur, Craig M Coopersmith, Joseph Nates, Christopher Doig, John Christman, R Duncan Hite, Derek C Angus, Stephen M Pastores, Vladimir Kvetan, and Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine.
• Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
• Crit. Care Med. 2018 Apr 1; 46 (4): e334-e341.

ObjectiveAcademic medical centers in North America are expanding their missions from the traditional triad of patient care, research, and education to include the broader issue of healthcare delivery improvement. In recent years, integrated Critical Care Organizations have developed within academic centers to better meet the challenges of this broadening mission. The goal of this article was to provide interested administrators and intensivists with the proper resources, lines of communication, and organizational approach to accomplish integration and Critical Care Organization formation effectively.DesignThe Academic Critical Care Organization Building section workgroup of the taskforce established regular monthly conference calls to reach consensus on the development of a toolkit utilizing methods proven to advance the development of their own academic Critical Care Organizations. Relevant medical literature was reviewed by literature search. Materials from federal agencies and other national organizations were accessed through the Internet.SettingThe Society of Critical Care Medicine convened a taskforce entitled "Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine" on February 22, 2016 at the 45th Critical Care Congress using the expertise of successful leaders of advanced governance Critical Care Organizations in North America to develop a toolkit for advancing Critical Care Organizations.Measurements And Main ResultsKey elements of an academic Critical Care Organization are outlined. The vital missions of multidisciplinary patient care, safety, and quality are linked to the research, education, and professional development missions that enhance the value of such organizations. Core features, benefits, barriers, and recommendations for integration of academic programs within Critical Care Organizations are described. Selected readings and resources to successfully implement the recommendations are provided. Communication with medical school and hospital leadership is discussed.ConclusionsWe present the rationale for critical care programs to transition to integrated Critical Care Organizations within academic medical centers and provide recommendations and resources to facilitate this transition and foster Critical Care Organization effectiveness and future success.

14 keywords...

hide…