• Sheng-Xing Wang, Hou-Lei Wang, Kai-Yuan Lin, Chong Bian, Chi Sun, and Jian Dong.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
• World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 1; 122: e1052-e1058.

BackgroundWe evaluated the surgical outcomes of metastatic spine hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and determined the factors that might influence the outcomes of metastatic HCC of the spine.MethodsFrom 2010 to 2017, 72 patients with HCC-derived metastatic spine tumors were treated in our department. For each patient, we recorded the pre- and postoperative visual analog scale score, Frankel grade, perioperative complications, and mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore a range of factors that might influence postoperative survival.ResultsThe mean postoperative survival was 10.8 ± 5.4 months. The concordance rate between a Tokuhashi score of 0-8 and a life expectancy of <6 months was only 19.2%. The mean postoperative survival for patients undergoing excisional surgery was 14.7 ± 6.5 months, and the mean survival of those receiving palliative surgery was 8.5 ± 2.6 months. Pain had significantly improved in both patient groups (P < 0.001). Paralysis did not change significantly in the excisional surgery group (P = 0.641) or palliative surgery group (P = 0.912). Univariate analysis showed that the preoperative Frankel score, Tomita score, Tokuhashi score, blood loss, multilevel metastases, and operative type were independent prognostic factors for postoperative survival time. Multivariate analysis showed that operation type was an independent factor for prognosis, just as were the Tomita score and Tokuhashi score.ConclusionsOur results have challenged previously reported estimates of the life expectancy correlating with the Tokuhashi score. Our results showed that excisional surgery resulted in better clinical outcomes compared with palliative surgery.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

27 keywords...

hide…