• Orion P Keifer, Kate Zeising, Muhibullah S Tora, Melissa Campbell, Yarema B Bezchlibnyk, and Nicholas Boulis.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
• World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 1; 122: 308-310.

BackgroundTrigeminal ganglion stimulation can be effective for trigeminal neuralgia. For patients who respond well to neurostimulation delivered percutaneously through the foramen ovale but require extensive revision and removal of instrumentation, a subtemporal approach for stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion is an alternative option as a salvage procedure.Case DescriptionWe report on a 47-year-old woman who responded well to neurostimulation for trigeminal neuropathic pain over a 1-year period from 2008 to 2009. Her preoperative pain on the numerical rating scale (NRS) was between 7 and 8 out of 10, which decreased to 2 out of 10 postoperatively. However, she developed lead migration because of a motor vehicle accident. After revision surgeries to correct this, she continued to experience pain relief until 2011. At follow-up, signs of infection prompted removal of instrumentation and subsequent return of her pain. She continued to experience persistent and severe pain (NRS score 7 of 10), which was intractable to pharmacologic treatment over 5 years. She returned in 2016 to discuss neurosurgical options, and the original approach was ruled out because of her history of lead migration, erosion, and scarring. A subtemporal approach was pursued as a salvage option, which provided several advantages for this patient.ConclusionsThe subtemporal approach for salvage placement of the trigeminal ganglion stimulating electrode was effective in this patient and minimized risks given her history of erosion and multiple operations. This suggests that the subtemporal approach is a viable salvage operation for trigeminal ganglion stimulation for trigeminal neuropathic pain.Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

27 keywords...

hide…