• Br J Anaesth · Dec 2018

    Review Meta Analysis

    Neuroprotection by anaesthetics in rodent models of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    • D P Archer, S K McCann, A M Walker, Z A Premji, K J Rogan, M J H Hutton, and L J Gray.
    • Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. Electronic address: darcher@ucalgary.ca.
    • Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec 1; 121 (6): 1272-1281.

    BackgroundAnaesthetic neuroprotection in the setting of traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unproved and is based upon the results in preclinical experiments. Here, we sought to synthesise the results in rodent models of TBI, and to evaluate the effects of publication bias, experimental manipulation, and poor study quality on the effect estimates.MethodsAfter a systematic review, we used pairwise meta-analysis to estimate the effect of anaesthetics, opioids, and sedative-hypnotics on neurological outcome, and network meta-analysis to compare their relative efficacy. We sought evidence of bias related to selective publication, experimental manipulation, and study quality.ResultsSixteen studies, involving 32 comparisons, were included (546 animals). The treatment improved the neurological outcomes by 35%; 95% confidence interval: 26-44%; P<0.001. The statistical heterogeneity was small (12%), but the 95% prediction interval for the estimate was wide (15-56%). The statistical power was low: 61% (90% confidence interval: 22-86%). The small sample size in the studies was a serious shortcoming reducing the statistical heterogeneity and obscuring differences in outcome between drugs and between experimental conditions.ConclusionsAnaesthetics do provide neuroprotection in rodent models of TBI. The effect-size estimates do not appear to be exaggerated by selective publication, experimental manipulation, or study design. The main shortcoming of the included studies were small sample sizes leading to low power and imprecision, which precluded the network meta-analysis from providing a meaningful ranking for efficacy amongst the drugs. Reliable preclinical investigations of neuroprotection by anaesthetics will require larger sample sizes.Copyright © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.