• Br J Anaesth · Dec 2018

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Seldinger vs modified Seldinger techniques for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterisation in neonates: a randomised controlled trial.

    • I-K Song, E-H Kim, J-H Lee, Y-E Jang, H-S Kim, and J-T Kim.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
    • Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec 1; 121 (6): 1332-1337.

    BackgroundCentral venous catheterisation in neonates is difficult. The purpose of this study was to compare the Seldinger and modified Seldinger techniques for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterisation in neonates.MethodsIn this randomised, controlled trial, 120 neonates (≤1 month old) requiring central venous catheterisation under general anaesthesia were allocated into either the Seldinger (n=60) or the modified Seldinger (n=60) group. The primary outcome was the incidence of successful catheterisation on the first attempt. We also assessed the incidences of successful puncture on the first attempt, successful guide wire insertion on the first attempt, and successful final catheterisation.ResultsThe primary outcome, the incidence of successful catheterisation on the first attempt was higher in the modified Seldinger group than in the Seldinger group (83% vs 65%; relative risk=1.282; 95% confidence interval, 1.032-1.594; P=0.025). The incidence of successful guide wire insertion on the first attempt was also higher in the modified Seldinger group (95% vs 75%; relative risk=1.267; 95% confidence interval, 1.082-1.482; P=0.003). Other incidences did not differ significantly between the groups.ConclusionsFor ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterisation in neonates, the modified Seldinger technique showed superiority over the Seldinger technique in terms of successful catheterisation and guide wire insertion on the first attempt.Clinical Trial RegistrationNCT02688595.Copyright © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…