-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Apr 2020
Propofol TCI Reductions Do Not Attenuate Significant Falls in Cardiac Output Associated With Anesthesia Induction and Knee-Chest Positioning in Spinal Surgery.
- Daniela Chaló, Sara Pedrosa, Pedro Amorim, Sónia Gouveia, and Consuelo Sancho.
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
- J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Apr 1; 32 (2): 147-155.
BackgroundInduction of anesthesia and the knee-chest position are associated with hemodynamic changes that may impact patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess whether planned reductions in target-controlled infusion propofol concentrations attenuate the hemodynamic changes associated with anesthesia induction and knee-chest position.Materilas And MethodsA total of 20 patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery in the knee-chest position were included. In addition to standard anesthesia monitoring, bispectral index and noninvasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring were undertaken. The study was carried out in 2 parts. In phase 1, target-controlled infusion propofol anesthesia was adjusted to maintain BIS 40 to 60. In phase 2, there were 2 planned reductions in propofol target concentration: (1) immediately after loss of consciousness-reduction calculated using a predefined formula, and (2) before positioning-reduction equal to the average percentage decrease in CO after knee-chest position in phase 1. Changes from baseline in CO and other hemodynamic variables following induction of anesthesia and knee-chest positioning were compared.ResultsInduction of anesthesia led to decreases of 25.6% and 19.8% in CO from baseline in phases 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.01). Knee-chest positioning resulted in a further decrease such that the total in CO reduction from baseline to 10 minutes after positioning was 38.4% and 46.9% in phases 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.01). There was no difference in CO changes between phases 1 and 2, despite the planned reductions in propofol during phase 2. There was no significant correlation between changes in CO and mean arterial pressure.ConclusionsPlanned reductions in propofol concentration do not attenuate anesthesia induction and knee-chest position-related decreases in CO. The knee-chest position is an independent risk factor for decrease in CO. Minimally invasive CO monitors may aid in the detection of clinically relevant hemodynamic changes and guide management in anesthetized patients in the knee-chest position.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.