• Br J Anaesth · May 2018

    Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of intranasal and intravenous dexmedetomidine.

    • A Li, V M Yuen, S Goulay-Dufaÿ, Y Sheng, J F Standing, P C L Kwok, LeungM K MMKMDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong., A S Leung, WongI C KICKDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong., and M G Irwin.
    • Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
    • Br J Anaesth. 2018 May 1; 120 (5): 960-968.

    BackgroundIntranasal dexmedetomidine produces safe, effective sedation in children and adults. It may be administered by drops from a syringe or by nasal mucosal atomisation (MAD NasalTM).MethodsThis prospective, three-period, crossover, double-blind study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of i.v. administration with these two different modes of administration. In each session each subject received 1 μg kg-1 dexmedetomidine, either i.v., intranasal with the atomiser or intranasal by drops. Dexmedetomidine plasma concentration and Ramsay sedation score were used for PK/PD modelling by NONMEM.ResultsThe i.v. route had a significantly faster onset (15 min, 95% CI 15-20 min) compared to intranasal routes by atomiser (47.5 min, 95% CI 25-135 min), and by drops (60 min, 95%CI 30-75 min), (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in sedation duration across the three treatment groups (P=0.88) nor in the median onset time between the two modes of intranasal administration (P=0.94). A 2-compartment disposition model, with transit intranasal absorption and clearance driven by cardiac output using the well-stirred liver model, was the final PK model. Intranasal bioavailability was estimated to be 40.6% (95% CI 34.7-54.4%) and 40.7% (95% CI 36.5-53.2%) for atomisation and drops respectively. Sedation score was modelled via a sigmoidal Emax model driven by an effect compartment. The effect compartment had an equilibration half time 3.3 (95% CI 1.8-4.7) min-1, and the EC50 was estimated to be 903 (95% CI 450-2344) pg ml-1.ConclusionsThere is no difference in bioavailability with atomisation or nasal drops. A similar degree of sedation can be achieved by either method.Clinical Trial RegistrationHKUCTR-1617.Copyright © 2017 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…