• Maureen Henry, Hudson Scholle Sarah S National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) , Washington, DC., and Jessica Briefer French.
• National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) , Washington, DC.
• J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar 1; 21 (S2): S68-S73.

BackgroundCare for patients with serious illness is an emerging practice area that has gained attention as value-based purchasing has increased. While the number of programs is growing, their impact on care quality and outcomes is unknown.ObjectiveWith support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) is assessing the feasibility of creating an accountability program focused on serious illness care.MethodsThis article describes the process of developing an accountability program, findings from our initial work, and our plans to develop measures for a serious illness care accountability program. We focused on three questions: 1. What patient populations should be targeted for measurement? 2. What entities have accountability for ensuring high-quality care for serious illness? 3. What structures, processes, and outcomes should be evaluated in an accountability program for serious illness care?ResultsOur environmental scan showed that the evidence base for specific patient populations or care models is not sufficiently mature to justify traditional structure and process measures. In visits to serious illness care programs, we observed different staffing models, care models, care settings, and payment structures. We found a gap between recommended inclusion criteria and services when compared to inclusion criteria and services offered by existing programs.ConclusionsTo address the challenges, NCQA intends to develop outcome measures driven by patient and family priorities. Structure and process measures will focus on building organizations' capacity to measure outcomes, including patient engagement and outcomes, linked to patient goals.

14 keywords...

hide…