• Ziad Faramand, Stephanie O Frisch, Amber DeSantis, Mohammad Alrawashdeh, Christian Martin-Gill, Clifton Callaway, and Salah Al-Zaiti.
• J Emerg Nurs. 2019 Mar 1; 45 (2): 161-168.

IntroductionAppropriate prehospital (PH) triage of patients with chest pain can significantly improve outcomes in acute myocardial infarction (MI). We sought to explore how PH providers triage chest pain as high versus low risk and to evaluate the accuracy and predictors of their triage decision.MethodsThis was a prospective, observational cohort study that enrolled consecutive patients with chest pain transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to 3 tertiary care hospitals in the US. EMS triage decision (high risk versus low-risk) was defined based on the transmission of PH electrocardiogram (ECG) to a command center for medical consultation with or without catheter laboratory activation. Two independent reviewers examined in-hospital medical records to adjudicate the presence of acute MI and to audit the findings on the presenting ECG.ResultsWe enrolled 2,065 patients (aged 56 ± 17, 53% male) of whom 768 (37%) were triaged as high risk. Those triaged as high risk were older, were more likely to be men or have significant cardiac history, and had a higher rate of acute MI events (14.2% versus 3.5%). The sensitivity and specificity for triaging MI events as high risk were 70% and 97%, respectively. A total of 46/155 (30%) MI events were misclassified as low risk. No previous coronary revascularization and ECG misinterpretation were strong independent predictors of such undertriage.ConclusionsPH providers have moderate sensitivity in triaging high-risk patients; 1 in 3 MI events are undertriaged. Emergency nurses need to pay special attention to patients with benign past histories during transition of care and should always reinterpret ECGs for subtle ischemic changes.Copyright © 2018 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

27 keywords...

hide…