• Sahereh Mirzaei, Alana Steffen, Karen Vuckovic, Catherine Ryan, Ulf Bronas, Jessica Zegre-Hemsey, and Holli A DeVon.
• J Emerg Nurs. 2019 Jul 1; 45 (4): 357-365.

IntroductionMore than 5.5 million patients present to emergency departments in the United States annually for potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, diagnosing ACS remains a challenge in emergency departments. Our aim was to describe the quality of symptoms (chest discomfort/description of pain, location/radiation, and overall symptom distress) reported by women and men ruled-in and ruled-out for ACS in emergency departments.MethodsThe sample consisted of 1,064 patients presenting to emergency departments with symptoms that triggered cardiac workups. Trained research staff obtained data using the ACS Patient Information Questionnaire upon patient presentation to emergency departments.ResultsThe sample (n = 1,064) included 474 (44.55%) patients ruled-in and 590 (55.45%) patients ruled-out for ACS. Symptom distress was significantly higher in patients ruled-in versus ruled-out for ACS (7.3 ± 2.6 vs. 6.8 ± 2.5; P = 0.002) and was a significant predictor for an ACS diagnosis in men (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.17; P = 0.003). Women also reported more chest pressure (51.75% vs. 44.65; P = 0.02) compared with men, and chest pressure was a significant predictor for a diagnosis of ACS (OR, 1.61; CI, 1.03-2.53; P = 0.02).DiscussionHigher levels of symptom distress may help ED personnel in making a decision to evaluate a patient for ACS, and the presence of chest pressure may aid in making a differential diagnosis of ACS.Copyright © 2019 Emergency Nurses Association. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…