• Annemarie Akkermans, van WaesJudith A RJARDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Local mail: Q04.2.313, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Aleda Thompson, Amy Shanks, Linda M Peelen, Michael F Aziz, Daniel A Biggs, William C Paganelli, Jonathan P Wanderer, Daniel L Helsten, Sachin Kheterpal, Wilton A van Klei, and Leif Saager.
• Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Local mail: Q04.2.313, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. a.akkermans@umcutrecht.nl.
• Can J Anaesth. 2019 Feb 1; 66 (2): 149-160.

PurposeDespite growing evidence supporting the potential benefits of higher end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) levels in surgical patients, there is still insufficient data to formulate guidelines for ideal intraoperative ETCO2 targets. As it is unclear which intraoperative ETCO2 levels are currently used and whether these levels have changed over time, we investigated the practice pattern using the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group database.MethodsThis retrospective, observational, multicentre study included 317,445 adult patients who received general anesthesia for non-cardiothoracic procedures between January 2008 and September 2016. The primary outcome was a time-weighted average area-under-the-curve (TWA-AUC) for four ETCO2 thresholds (< 28, < 35, < 45, and > 45 mmHg). Additionally, a median ETCO2 was studied. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyse differences between years. Random-effect multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to study variability.ResultsBoth TWA-AUC and median ETCO2 showed a minimal increase in ETCO2 over time, with a median [interquartile range] ETCO2 of 33 [31.0-35.0] mmHg in 2008 and 35 [33.0-38.0] mmHg in 2016 (P <0.001). A large inter-hospital and inter-provider variability in ETCO2 were observed after adjustment for patient characteristics, ventilation parameters, and intraoperative blood pressure (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.58).ConclusionsBetween 2008 and 2016, intraoperative ETCO2 values did not change in a clinically important manner. Interestingly, we found a large inter-hospital and inter-provider variability in ETCO2 throughout the study period, possibly indicating a broad range of tolerance for ETCO2, or a lack of evidence to support a specific targeted range. Clinical outcomes were not assessed in this study and they should be the focus of future research.

20 keywords...

hide…