• Chirurg · May 1994

    Comparative Study

    [Laparoscopic and conventional suture of perforated peptic ulcers--a comparison].

    • E Eypasch, W Spangenberger, B Ure, R Mennigen, and H Troidl.
    • II. Chirurgischer Lehrstuhl, Universität zu Köln.
    • Chirurg. 1994 May 1; 65 (5): 445-50.

    AbstractAfter the first successful laparoscopic closure of a perforated peptic ulcer in 1990, 13 consecutive patients with laparoscopic closure were compared to 8 previous patients with conventional surgery. The endpoints adverse advents (complications), pain intensity, fever, leucocytosis and hospital stay showed no clinically relevant differences. Consumption of analgesics was lower in the laparoscopy group. Laparoscopic closure of perforated peptic ulcer is technically feasible. The safety of the method and the benefit for the patient need proof by a randomized controlled trial.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…