-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Jul 2019
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Observational StudyCarotid Revascularization Procedures and Perioperative Outcomes: A Multistate Analysis, 2007-2014.
- Abdullah S Rasheed, Robert S White, Virginia Tangel, Bess M Storch, and Kane O Pryor.
- Department of Anesthesiology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: asr9042@nyp.org.
- J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2019 Jul 1; 33 (7): 1963-1972.
ObjectiveTo compare in-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, and combined stroke/mortality in carotid artery stenting (CAS) patients and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients.DesignRetrospective observational study using data from the State Inpatient Database, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.SettingAll coded CAS or CEA hospitalizations from 2007 to 2014 in California, Florida, New York, Kentucky, and Maryland.ParticipantsA total of 198,120 patients, 18 years of age or older, undergoing CAS or CEA.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsPrimary outcomes of the study were unadjusted rates and adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, postoperative cardiovascular complications, and combined stroke/mortality, before and after correcting for confounders, following either CEA or CAS. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, in each successive individual year, CAS was associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] ≥1.5 and p < 0.05), postoperative stroke (OR ≥1.4 and p < 0.05), and combined stroke/mortality (OR ≥1.5 and p < 0.05). Similar significant results were obtained when multivariate logistic regression was stratified by symptomatology. Carotid artery stenting was associated with higher odds of cardiovascular complications in 2012 (OR = 1.5, p < 0.05) and lower odds in 2009 (OR = 0.8, p < 0.05).ConclusionThis study associated carotid stenting, as compared to endarterectomy, with an increased risk of dying and/or stroke. These associations persisted after statistical adjustment for patient demographics, comorbidities, and symptomatology, as well as after post-stratification by patient symptomatology. Despite this study's large, representative sample and well-defined a priori statistical methods, further research into real-world revascularization outcomes with longer-term follow-up is needed to formulate treatment guidelines.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.