• Medicina intensiva · Mar 2019

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Efficacy of respiratory muscle training in weaning of mechanical ventilation in patients with mechanical ventilation for 48hours or more: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

    • L M Sandoval Moreno, I C Casas Quiroga, E C Wilches Luna, and A F García.
    • Fisioterapeuta, especialista en fisioterapia cardiopulmonar, Magister en Epidemiología. Fisioterapeuta de la Unidad de Cuidado Intensivo de la Fundación Valle del Líli. Docente Escuela de Rehabilitación Humana, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle. Miembro del Grupo de Investigación en Ejercicio y Salud Cardiopulmonar (GIESC). Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia. Electronic address: linamarce48@gmail.com.
    • Med Intensiva. 2019 Mar 1; 43 (2): 79-89.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of respiratory muscular training in the weaning of mechanical ventilation and respiratory muscle strength in patients on mechanical ventilation of 48hours or more.DesignRandomized controlled trial of parallel groups, double-blind. Ambit: Intensive Care Unit of a IV level clinic in the city of Cali.Patients126 patients in mechanical ventilation for 48hours or more.InterventionsThe experimental group received daily a respiratory muscle training program with treshold, adjusted to 50% of maximal inspiratory pressure, additional to standard care, conventional received standard care of respiratory physiotherapy. MAIN INTEREST VARIABLES: weaning of mechanical ventilation. Other variables evaluated: respiratory muscle strength, requirement of non-invasive mechanical ventilation and frequency of reintubation.Analysisintention-to-treat analysis was performed with all variables evaluated and analysis stratified by sepsis condition.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in the median weaning time of the MV between the groups or in the probability of extubation between groups (HR: 0.82 95% CI: 0.55-1.20 P=.29). The maximum inspiratory pressure was increased in the experimental group on average 9.43 (17.48) cmsH20 and in the conventional 5.92 (11.90) cmsH20 (P=.48). The difference between the means of change in maximal inspiratory pressure was 0.46 (P=.83 95%CI -3.85 to -4.78).Conclusionsrespiratory muscle training did not demonstrate efficacy in the reduction of the weaning period of mechanical ventilation nor in the increase of respiratory muscle strength in the study population. Registered study at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02469064).Copyright © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…