• Burns · Aug 2019

    Prevalence and Risk Factors for Hypertrophic Scarring of Split Thickness Autograft Donor Sites in a Pediatric Burn Population.

    • R Maxwell Rotatori, Brian Starr, Mitchell Peake, Laura Fowler, Laura James, Judy Nelson, and Elizabeth L Dale.
    • University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3230 Eden Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45267, United States; Shriners Hospital for Children - Cincinnati, 3229 Burnett Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, United States.
    • Burns. 2019 Aug 1; 45 (5): 1066-1074.

    TitlePrevalence and Risk Factors for Hypertrophic Scarring of Split Thickness Autograft Donor Sites in a Pediatric Burn Population.ObjectiveThe split-thickness autograft remains a fundamental treatment for burn injuries; however, donor sites may remain hypersensitive, hyperemic, less pliable, and develop hypertrophic scarring. This study sought to assess the long-term scarring of donor sites after pediatric burns.MethodsA retrospective review of pediatric burn patients treated at a single institution (2010-2016) was performed. Primary outcomes were prevalence of donor site hypertrophic scarring, scarring time course, and risk factor assessment.Results237 pediatric burn patients were identified. Mean age at burn was 7 yrs., mean %TBSA was 26% with 17% being Full Thickness. Mean follow-up was 2.4 yrs. Hypertrophic scarring was observed in 152 (64%) patients with 81 (34%) patients having persistent hypertrophic scarring through long-term follow-up. Patient-specific risk factors for hypertrophic scarring were Hispanic ethnicity (P=0.03), increased %TBSA (P=0.03), %Full Thickness burn (P=0.02) and total autograft amount (P=0.03). Donor site factors for hypertrophic scarring were longer time to epithelialization (P<0.0001), increased donor site harvest depth (P<0.0001), autografts harvested in the acute burn setting (P=0.008), and thigh donor site location (vs. all other sites; P<0.0001). The scalp, arm, foot, and lower leg donor sites (vs. all other sites) were less likely to develop HTS (P<0.0001, 0.02, 0.005, 0.002, respectively), along with a history of previous donor site harvest (P=0.04).ConclusionsHypertrophic scarring is a prominent burden in donor site wounds of pediatric burn patients. Knowledge of pertinent risk factors can assist with guiding management and expectations.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…